View Single Post
Old 09-30-2015, 06:37 PM   #56
mrscoach
Guru
mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mrscoach ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mrscoach's Avatar
 
Posts: 767
Karma: 4837659
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Angelo Texas
Device: Samsung Galaxy tab
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieTigger View Post
What difference does that make? The end result is the same. Whether they appeal or not if it is not selected for review matters little as to why. The Supreme Court is under no obligation to make public the reason.
I took phogg's use of appeal as attractive. That if not chosen then the supreme court isn't attracted to apple. Some people like apples, some don't. I thought it was a play on words.
mrscoach is offline   Reply With Quote