Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
But the fact is: pretty-much everyone's opinions in this thread about the "legalities" of it all, are based on someone else's opinions of the legalities of it all. And it's quite natural that those "expert" opinions which happen to coincide with our own preconceived notions would seem more objective and factual to us. It's called confirmation bias.
|
Actually, no. Even layman can understand the law and know that Apple is not directly fighting the anti-trust (collusion) allegations. They're simply claiming that the "ends justified the means." Which means absolutely nothing in a court of law.