View Single Post
Old 01-01-2009, 02:31 PM   #16
Valloric
Created Sigil, FlightCrew
Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Valloric ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Valloric's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,982
Karma: 350515
Join Date: Feb 2008
Device: Kobo Clara HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by zelda_pinwheel View Post
oh, i would be very interested in a new tool to create epubs, particularly if it includes image support !!! and i think there would be quite a lot of people interested in that, in fact. have you seen some of the suggestions in the epub poll thread ? (for instance jellby's). i hope you do find the time for it. please keep us posted. i don't care about bd support so i'd be interested even in early versions with just basic features.
I plan on making the first public release when I have decent epub output working. After all, the driving force is creating an epub editor, and I do understand that a lot of people don't care for LRF now that there's an open and future-oriented standard for ebooks, and it's supported on the PRS-505. But LRF is a good format for the Reader, in and of itself. I have very few gripes with it... and one has to think of the PRS-500 owners.

Also, not everybody has a Reader, and if one's to create a replacement for BD, one should support the other, more obscure formats. I plan to get to them all eventually.

But creating a great epub editor is top priority. Creating an application that can replace BD for all tasks is number two. Number three is creating a body of portable, well-designed, well-performing and very well documented C++ code for all those formats, so other people can plug it in their own (open source) applications and have various output options. I expect that creating an editor that exports full-featured LRF will entail walking through the fires of Hell... there's very little documentation on it. So if I have to struggle to figure it out and support it, it would be great if I can spare other people the trouble.

Oh, and I plan on providing binaries for Windows, Mac and Linux. There's been enough of platform-locked applications already... I don't plan on making another.

EDIT: And thanks for the link to the poll thread, haven't noticed it before.

Last edited by Valloric; 01-01-2009 at 02:52 PM.
Valloric is offline   Reply With Quote