View Single Post
Old 09-24-2015, 08:14 PM   #47
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,376
Karma: 42994616
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
The thing is, since the vast majority of products sold at retail have the price set by the retailer . . .
You mean, in the United States? I'm just asking because of mildly objecting to that being the default country

In a dollar store, sounds right.

In a supermarket, I wonder. Most of the stuff we buy is on a promotion. Do Coke and Pepsi let them charge whatever they want? Might the policies vary so much from year to year than any prior study is already out of date?

Of course, there are lots of times when the retailer sets the price within a range. Apple is a prime example, explaining why Amazon won't sell many of their current products (except through third party sellers). But it seems like Apple is letting Amazon sell older stuff at high prices:

http://www.amazon.com/Apple-iPad-MC7...AATVPDKIKX0DER

Might Barnes & Noble be moving from books to toys to get away from retail price maintenance? Probably not:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123007559680631543
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote