View Single Post
Old 09-21-2015, 03:20 PM   #7
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Perhaps you could customize your tags by using a semicolon instead of a comma in the tag body.


As for "could be modified", perhaps so -- see what Kovid thinks.
I don't believe anyone has ever requested it before, which explains why it definitely wasn't an option thus far.



Personally, I think library science should change the primary purpose of a tag is to help people find things, and relational databases allow you to find things a lot more easily than the flat card catalog model.

I see no reason to limit yourself to the old ways. Break up your tags into a form more easily manipulated by queries.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote