Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros
Which is why it was a textbook case of collusion. And the point -- again -- is that Apple is not denying what they did (which is an anti-trust violation) they're just trying to justify it.
|
The point is that whither or not what Apple did is illegal depends if you use the per se definition of anti-trust as Cote did, or you use the rule of reason definition of anti-trust, as the Supreme Court instructed in Leegan. In anti-trust, your market position is extremely important. Apple had no market position since they had not entered into the market yet.