Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
Or, they actually might be aware of the legal definition of anti-trust, as defined by the Supreme Court and thus believe that they did not do anything wrong. There is a reason that the Justice Department never tried to prove that Apple was guilty by rule of reason rather than per se.
Jobs, of course, never did any such thing. He suggested to the book publishers that they adopt a tiered model similar to the iTunes music store. The book publishers turned that down.
|
Secret meetings and communication suggests that they all knew that what they were doing wasn't legal. Otherwise, why try to hide it? If you are caught, you can apologize or trying to justify it. The former I can accept, the latter I hate.