View Single Post
Old 09-18-2015, 04:31 PM   #5
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros View Post
The headline is misleading. Apple has asked for 30 day extension so they can (potentially) file. They're still trotting out the old "we used anti-trust because Amazon was too powerful" argument. I don't think the "end justifies the means" argument will work -- but the Supreme Court decisions have been pretty wonky lately (they think it's their right to write laws now), so I guess Apple figures why not give a shot.
No, as the article said, they are trotting out the old "Cote failed to consider the case in the proper framework", i.e. Cote used to per se criteria for determining anti trust rather than the rule of reason, which was the decision in the Leegin case (2007) the most recent Supreme Court anti trust decision.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote