View Single Post
Old 09-10-2015, 11:32 AM   #126
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
The way the evidence is stacking up, however, there is even more money in putting the title in KU and setting the sale price at $3.99. ($0.99 pricing is increasingly "so last year..." )
Agreed, although it's a fixed pot size determined by Amazon. So it mostly depends on how many people they have using KU.
In it's simplest breakdown - if less total money goes into the KU Pot than went into the old buying ebooks pot then authors/producers/publishers as a whole will make less money (and most subscription users only use the subscription to save money - Gym users being the obvious exception).

Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
One thing to remember is that it makes a difference who the publisher is when it comes to subscription sevices. A payout level that is perfectly fine for author/publishers (AKA Indies) or small tradpubs in the Carolinas or Michigan will be totally unacceptable to a BPH with seven Vice presidents per imprint and Manhattan glass tower rents.
Agreed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Justifying high prices over an unwillingness to address non-value add overhead isn't going to resonate with buyers who only care about their costs. I.e., those not employed by publishers.
True, but if the publisher can't cover the non-value (or even value) added overhead then they go bust if they try to enter KU, so it's a moot point.
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote