View Single Post
Old 09-02-2015, 11:33 AM   #161
doubleshuffle
Unicycle Daredevil
doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
doubleshuffle's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,944
Karma: 185432100
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet of the Pudding Brains
Device: Aura HD (R.I.P. After six years the USB socket died.) tolino shine 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjaybe View Post
No, it's not. The basis of this thread is a newspaper article whose premise is that Pratchett isn't a literary genius. It's been diverted into this pointless comparison with "the greats." Whether he's ever acknowledged as "great" is not dependent on whether he has genius. Contributing to the silliness of this thread is the fact that "genius" can't be defined conclusively.
Well, if you re-read the article that started this thread, you will find that its author asserts what he thinks is Pratchett's mediocrity by telling us which writers he thinks are great. These things, silly or not, only work by comparing. So no diversion at all there.

As to the silliness of this thread: Seems it isn't silly enough for you not to participate...
doubleshuffle is offline   Reply With Quote