The way he comments on our world in a funny and wise way, without his stories just being analogies. It is a special way, how he does this and that he don't use humor in the way most other authors use it. For example, he normally didn't use it in a negative way.
And there isn't just one "category" of writers. Why always compare him to Austin etc.? Why not authors like Raabe, Tucholsky, Jean Paul, Caroll etc? The literary discurse is wider than just classic novels.
|