View Single Post
Old 09-01-2015, 10:24 AM   #182
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,767
Karma: 206758686
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Would it prevent it? Could it not still be achieved by having two slates, with three of their favourites on each one? You'd need twice as many people to achieve the same goal, with 50% submitting one slate, and 50% the other, but it could still be done, couldn't it?
Well sure. But the organization and logistics involved in a multi-headed campaign like that would be harder to pull off. "Everyone nominate these" is trivial compared to "You nominate these and you other yous nominate these others (making sure there are sufficient numbers for each subcampain)."

@pdurrant: which other proposal were you referring to? None of them really struck me as unworthy--with the exception of the one proposed rule change to ensure a single, specific movie would still be elegible.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote