Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
No but it was what the rabid puppies were doing.
But here I just wanted people to say that is is wrong to vote with the intention of destroying the award regardless of if anybody have done it. The question if anybody has done it we can discus if people think it is wrong. But since people refuse to admit that it is wrong it is not necessary to discus if it has happened.
|
Sure, it's wrong to vote with the intention of destroying the award. Of course the only person saying people are voting to destroy the award is yourself.
Still, now I've admitted it's wrong to vote to destroy the award I assume you will be admitting that it is wrong to vote because the author/work is ticking some diversity boxes instead of being voted on the quality of writing/story.
And while I think about it how about all the lockstep slate voting of all the puppy nominations for No Award, I read it all and although some of it wasn't great, placing
all of it below no award was a bit harsh and could very easily fit your claim of voting with the intention of destroying the award.