View Single Post
Old 09-01-2015, 09:24 AM   #178
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
I think the proposed 4 and 6 rule is a step in the right direction. It does nothing to restrict anyone's ability to nominate and/or campaign/promote/suggest to their hearts content. 4 and 6 makes sure that no one group can ever really dictate the entire shortlist for a category. Everyone can nominate four for any one category and the top six make the shortlist for the big vote.
Would it prevent it? Could it not still be achieved by having two slates, with three of their favourites on each one? You'd need twice as many people to achieve the same goal, with 50% submitting one slate, and 50% the other, but it could still be done, couldn't it?
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote