Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
It was a simple question. Why can you not answer it? It was not a question about how to detect things. It was a question about if you thought a certain action was OK or no (morally).
|
No, you are implying that part of the puppy slate nominators/voters did not read every book they nominated while everybody else did 100%. Unless there is a rule in place that prohibits (not merely encourages) that a book has to be read. Are you quite certain that every "no award" resulted from the voter actually reading the complete slate (in a category)? Not just a few that claim they did so, but all of them. If you think it is not morally necessary to read through a book to vote "no award", but it is for nominating, then you are on a really slippery road.
Every rule change to discourage, disable, not allow slate voting that is put in place will effectively take away campaigning. That would, have to agree with Harry there, take away part of the democratic nature of the nominating / voting process.