View Single Post
Old 08-31-2015, 02:12 PM   #142
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
No, I'm afraid you've entirely misunderstood the reason for my disagreement with the views expressed by Tommy and others. I see the attempt to restrict the freedom of people to nominate whichever books they wish as an attack on the very principles of the democratic nature of the Hugo awards. Those principles include the rights to campaign for your favoured nominations.
So you actually think it is OK and not a bad thing and bad action (morally) to nominate a book you have not read or nominate a book you think is crap? Yes or no?

Last edited by tompe; 08-31-2015 at 02:36 PM.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote