Thread: The Guardian click-bait - Get real. Terry Pratchett is not a literary genius
View Single Post
Old 08-31-2015, 02:05 PM   #48
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 82,998
Karma: 153235221
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
Why, a falsified history text of course. Ether way it is still indisputably a history text.

Perhaps the Wikipedia definition of a "novel" can help you resolve your confusion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novel
We aren't calling it a history text. We are calling it a plain old work of fiction. What type of book is it?
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote