Thread: The Guardian click-bait - Get real. Terry Pratchett is not a literary genius
View Single Post
Old 08-31-2015, 10:29 AM   #7
icallaci
Guru
icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 819
Karma: 6528026
Join Date: Sep 2012
Device: Kobo Elipsa
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Where in the article does he refer to him as "worthless"? He calls him "mediocre", but "mediocre" means "of average quality, neither good nor bad". It does not mean "worthless".
"Actual literature may be harder to get to grips with than a Discworld novel, but it is more worth the effort." Terry Pratchett is worthless to him. Not worth his effort.
Last edited by icallaci; 08-31-2015 at 10:41 AM.
icallaci is offline   Reply With Quote