View Single Post
Old 08-23-2015, 05:30 PM   #27
jgaiser
Omnivorous
jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jgaiser ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jgaiser's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,283
Karma: 27978909
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rural NW Oregon
Device: Kindle Voyage, Kindle Fire HD, Kindle 3, KPW1
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbm View Post
This is "suppose" to be the award for the best in Science Fiction, not a political statement. If you do not like the what was nominated then do not vote for that category, do not vote "no award". Voting "no award" dishonors the memory every author who has won the award in the past.
So... If I read all the entries in a category and *I* decided none of them are up to the standards of the past 50 years, then I need to keep my mouth shut and not register my opinion? Really? The 'No Award' is there for a reason, and just because you don't like it doesn't mean my use of it "Dishonors" anybody. I read most of the categories that the SP/RP owned and *none* deserved an award. If I had voted this year, the slates would have all been "No Award". If the puppies think they are being underrepresented, they need to nominate stories that can compete. Not second-rate pulp.
jgaiser is offline   Reply With Quote