View Single Post
Old 08-23-2015, 05:05 PM   #26
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbm View Post
This is "suppose" to be the award for the best in Science Fiction, not a political statement. If you do not like the what was nominated then do not vote for that category, do not vote "no award". Voting "no award" dishonors the memory every author who has won the award in the past.
So... if someone truly believes that none of the nominations are worthy, then voting "none of them are worthy" dishonors people who you thought were worthy ten years ago?
(I wonder why the No Award option exists )

I don't understand your logic.
At least, you seem to be missing critical portions of your argument (as in, the beginning, middle, and end).

Quote:
The Hugo's maybe on antibiotics but they are a long way from being seriously ill.


bernie
Bit of a contradiction in terms, if you ask me...
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote