View Single Post
Old 08-21-2015, 08:06 AM   #97
Dexmaster
Connoisseur
Dexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a TexanDexmaster might easily be mistaken for a Texan
 
Dexmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 72
Karma: 18445
Join Date: Apr 2014
Device: Kindle PW5 (11th gen, 6.8in)
Quote:
Originally Posted by idoit View Post
Now on to my quest for discussion on screen health.
Here is my opinion:
If there is no refreshes there is less work on a hardware side, and if there is less work, screen will have longer lifespan. Even screen lifetime is calculated in screen refreshes for example declared lifetime of E-ink Pearl Screen is equal to 10 million screen updates.

Other then killing it physically it's hard to make it lose contrast or have some work-related damage. There could be some burst "capsules" on the eInk screen but they are 110% physically created.

The 1st generation eInk screens did fade after some time(2-3weeks) but only to a specific condition where their performance stabilized and after that fade, it had no more changes over time.
Dexmaster is offline   Reply With Quote