Quote:
Originally Posted by WT Sharpe
In such a scenario, the political differences between the Patriots and the Loyalists would be fair game for discussion. What would NOT be permitted would be to bring the discussion to bear upon current political situations and infusing it with partisan politics. Likewise in that other thread that was quoted above, it's fine to argue about the degree of influence the Judeo/Christian/Islamic Scriptures have had upon society, but taking sides, either pro or con, concerning the merits or claims of those Scriptures is P&R territory.
|
I could nominate a book that has current enough politics that it would have to be discussed in P&R. So if it's not OK for one book, it should not book OK for all books (IMHO).