View Single Post
Old 08-09-2015, 02:56 PM   #84
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by webroot View Post
A quick googling on capacitive and IR touch technologies will tell you that IR is not so responsive and it require you to actually place fingers so that IR beams are obstructed whereas in capacitive can work with a slight gap and that has a "smooth touch" experience in a swipe gesture (between the two ends).
That says absolutely nothing about the responsiveness. I'm not so sure I want the screen to register input before I actually try touching it.

In any event, whatever you have heard, IR vs. capacitive has always been about registering screen contact vs. registering actual finger contact. e.g. capacitive touch does not trigger when a piece of clothing brushes the screen.

Quote:
IR is used because its cheap. if it were good then tabs would have used them instead but perhaps eink will not be able to get any advantage from a capacitive owing to its own slowiness and with the help of 64mb ram
See above, under "piece of clothing brushes the screen". There are valid reasons to want capacitive touch on ereaders, so please stop suggesting I have said otherwise.

Capacitive touch has advantages over IR touch... because it has fewer false positives.

P.S. A number of ereaders use capacitive touch, not IR. That actually makes some people (like Ripplinger) angry.

P.P.S. Try 256 MB RAM.
But what does RAM have to do with capacitive touch? DO you have any facts at all?

Quote:
well it may be that printed page turns take same time but the point is it do not provide any progressive tactile feedback or animation in case of eink page turning or changing windows creates irritation, when i am turning paper paper something is happening right? so that time is bearable.
I'll say it again -- some people actively go around looking for things to complain about.

Quote:
in this forum i have seen some people who swipe before reaching end of the page so by the time they reach end page turn can begin.
Page turning usually takes less time than it takes to read a single word. Maybe if the user had an ereader that was abnormally slow, perhaps (?) one of the really old brands.
Or if they have a device that has a well-known firmware issue, i.e. something that really needs to be fixed -- and will.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote