View Single Post
Old 07-21-2015, 01:06 PM   #51
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by BearMountainBooks View Post
I'll just agree to disagree. I review less than ever before because of the invasive nature of trolling that goes on. I'm happy with that decision. I'm sure you'll be equally happy with your decisions.
Do you know for a fact that Amazon goes trolling on SM to sniff out bogus reviewers? If you notice, what the indie author claimed Amazon did and what Amazon stated it did in its email to her are not the same thing. The author actually misquotes Amazon in her blog post. Amazon never said they determined her friendship with the author of the book by examining "online" activity, yet the indie author claims that is what Amazon said. Amazon said "account" activity which would likely mean only things related to her account at Amazon (like past reviews, wish lists, comments left under other reviews, etc.).

At any rate, there is no excuse for misquoting someone, and that appears to be what the indie author did. It makes me question her entire story just because of that one misstep -- whether innocent or not.

--Pat
PatNY is offline   Reply With Quote