View Single Post
Old 07-15-2015, 02:52 AM   #40
Fiat_Lux
Addict
Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Fiat_Lux's Avatar
 
Posts: 394
Karma: 6700000
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Gimel
Device: tablets
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
Also, I still want to know what the point of your original statement was, because I can't see why it matters whether or not most ebook pirates don't know what a torrent is.
Apps like 100,00 Free Books in the Google Play store appear to be legit, but probably aren't.

Likewise, to the casual user, sites like Library Genesis appear to be legit.

Then there is UseNet, which used to, and for all I know, still has gigabytes of files flowing through the pipe line, every day. Again, to the naive user, those postings could be construed as being legit.

And finally, IRC, which is about as easy to setup, as a torrent client. This is a little harder to claim "legit", but even so, some legitimate material is exchanged this way, so there is a chance that a person could think that everything exchanged thusly was legit.

I have no idea what the market share of those four methods is, or how that usage compares to torrent sites. However, I wouldn't be surprised if they were responsible for more illicit distribution, than torrents are. Certainly the first option (apps like 100,000 Free Books) is responsible for more innocent downloading than torrents are.
Fiat_Lux is offline   Reply With Quote