View Single Post
Old 07-13-2015, 09:55 AM   #41
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
HarryT, perhaps you would like to examine the actual, like, case and everything. As latepaul pointed out, Google was found guilty of copying a single nine-line function. Here are the nine lines: https://majadhondt.wordpress.com/201...ogles-9-lines/

Additionally, Oracle waived their right to the minimal statutory damages they were eligible for.

The bulk of the case concerned APIs. The infamous concept of "structure, sequence, and organization".
The latest rulings on the Oracle vs. Google case have overturned all reason and a great deal of good precedence (and the pre-appeal verdict against Oracle) -- by declaring that APIs can be copyrighted, and that clean-room implementations violate copyrights on the APIs.

An excellent start to begin researching the case would be the Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle...v._Google,_Inc.

Last edited by eschwartz; 07-13-2015 at 10:10 AM.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote