View Single Post
Old 07-11-2015, 09:20 PM   #13
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,767
Karma: 206758686
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
This seems to me an objection to the current takedown system.
It is indeed.

I firmly believe that takedowns should only occur at the request of the verified rights holder (after whatever vetting process is necessary to prove one is indeed the rights-holder--or acting on their behalf). That, and I oppose any and all automated/robo takedowns and/or stream interruptions based on on alleged (yet entirely unsubstantiated) infringement claims. And anything that requires non-authoritative parties to act as enforcers for uncorroborated copyright disputes is bogus as well

Shutting things down on--let's face it--hearsay, if we're being totally honest, and sorting it out later (if at all) is completely unacceptable.

Their new "requests" are overstepping bounds that were already overstepped long ago.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote