As for legal experts in general, I suggest you look back through previous discussions here. You weren't convinced in the past, I see no reason why regurgitating names will change anything today.
As for Judge Jacobs, you are wrong. He agreed with the majority ruling that Apple did indeed conspire -- but he said that Apple should get a free pass on having done so, on the grounds that a conspiracy was pro-competitive in breaking the legendary Amazon stranglehold -- and therefore it shouldn't be an anti-trust offense.
Go read this thread from post #426. Oh, wait, you did -- because at the time you engaged in the discussion.
Must've slipped your mind.
