Thread: Apple gripes about antitrust monitoring
View Single Post
Old 07-05-2015, 04:43 PM   #458
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
Yes, this would be the longstanding argument between you on one side and the Supreme Court, legal experts in general, and most MR members on the side -- you assert that Apple did not negotiate a contract together with all the BWMs.

Glad we got that cleared up.
Well, actually not. Currently it's Judge Cote, Judge Livingston and Judge Lohier on one side and Judge Jacobs and myself on the other. Neither the full 2nd nor the Supreme Court have weighted in on the matter. Fairly interesting that Lohier simply found that Apple was per se guilty and disagreed with Livingston on the rest. As far as legal experts in general, glad to know that you have done an extensive survey. Care to share the data on your survey, or is "most legal experts" an assertion on your part because you are trying the classic rhetorical device of appealing to authority?
Last edited by pwalker8; 07-05-2015 at 04:49 PM.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote