View Single Post
Old 07-05-2015, 10:13 AM   #129
Rizla
Member Retired
Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,183
Karma: 11721895
Join Date: Nov 2010
Device: Nook STR (rooted) & Sony T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Every method has pros and cons, but it hardly seems fair to criticise Amazon for not providing a capability which they have never advertised the Kindle as providing.
Kindles are a bit, well, crap when it comes to organizing collections. At least, that's as I understand it. As JS pointed out, doubtless Amazon could have modified the device to continue to allow users to organize collections on their devices via Calibre, without easily and accidentally trashing the collections, if they'd chosen to. They chose not to, instead preferring to enforce the collection system to be Amazon / cloud based, instead of device-based. Indeed, you don't have the ability to organize books into collections on a Kindle without registering it.

So basically, I stick to my advice to the OP. When it comes to collections, Kobo > Kindle, IMO, especially if you have a lot of books
Rizla is offline   Reply With Quote