View Single Post
Old 07-03-2015, 08:53 AM   #24
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebusinesstutor View Post
I didn't realize they were paying near retail rates - that is a recipe for disaster.

If I read 30 books per month and only pay $9, they would be losing money.

I thought they were pooling the subscription money and sharing it with authors based on how often their books were read.
That is the widely decried (by Smashwords and others) Kindle unlimited approach.

Last I heard, the Smashwords titles that Scribd dropped earned something like 60% of cover price the moment the reader exceeded 10% read. Even if it was never finished. So a $5 romance cost Scribd $3 and everybody reading 4 of those books a month could sink them. The Scribd CEO has been previously quoted that subscribers averaged one book a month. It was either a misquote, an outright lie (that could lead to a legal drama), or total cluelessness (ditto).

I'm not sure but I think I heard that Oyster payouts were geared to percentages read (better) but topped out at 80% of cover (not so good).

Naturally, publishers clearly prefer Scribd and Oyster terms to Amazon terms. May they enjoy them while they last.

https://m.youtube.com/?#/watch?v=q3CLc0IGstk
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote