View Single Post
Old 07-02-2015, 07:42 PM   #446
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,441
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by avantman42 View Post
Just to clarify, usually "harm" is considered to be all about prices (higher prices equal harm, lower prices equal no harm). Does the law allow for other harms to be considered?
The law is vague enough that prosecutors and courts can change the focus. It's a common observation that the original focus was on the harm to competition, while the more recent focus is harm to consumers.

Support for my last paragraph is in footnotes found here:

http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/vie...83&context=flr

And in this readable book:

https://store.kobobooks.com/en-US/eb...nkkRetH_koN_.g
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote