View Single Post
Old 07-02-2015, 04:41 AM   #439
avantman42
Wizard
avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
avantman42's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,090
Karma: 6058305
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
In the US consumer harm is the yardstick, yes.
That's what I thought, thanks. Just to clarify, usually "harm" is considered to be all about prices (higher prices equal harm, lower prices equal no harm). Does the law allow for other harms to be considered? For example, if prices stayed the same, but quality suffered, would that be grounds for anti-trust action?
avantman42 is offline   Reply With Quote