View Single Post
Old 07-01-2015, 08:10 PM   #32
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,424
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
(Of course, if there are enough Mac users on the SCOTUS...)
I can't put my finger on why, but I don't see them dividing on Mac vs. PC lines.

One big difference between appeals court and supreme court judges is the likelihood of being a trade book author.

The published authors on the court, I suspect, think that their eBooks are worth a heck of a lot more than Amazon wants to charge. And the ones who aren't big-five-published authors probably aspire to be. While this doesn't lead, in a straight logical line, to an Apple victory, I think it would be a factor it the Supreme Court actually took the case.

I do realize that the Supremes probably would not take the case, since they accept for review only a small portion of cases sent them.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote