Quote:
Originally Posted by howyoudoin
Legal guys on online forums thrive off being contrarian. You could state something absolutely true and reasonable and they'd still try and pull rank on you just because they feel compelled to.
|
I do not agree (and am not just being contrarian). I read all the briefs, the decision, the briefs on appeal, and even the little bit I remembered from Antitrust Law 35 years ago, this was a clear violation. There is no--but it was for the greater good-defense. If you think there is an illegal monopoly, you go to the Justice department, as Amazon did with the Apple BPH conspiracy. There is no claim of self-defense to a violation of the Sherman Act (or any white collar crimes I can think of. But you can call me out on that one).
I get my jollies fighting with the IRS--I don't need to troll.
