View Single Post
Old 06-29-2015, 11:11 PM   #7
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgalbrecht View Post
The analysis I saw at another website (I think Ars Technica), the Supreme Court left it open to the possibility that Google's use was not copyright infringement due to fair use, and that Google may yet appeal on those grounds. Unfortunately, fair use is decided on a case-by-case evaluation, so even if Google gets the case dismissed because of fair use, another court could rule that another defendant using the exact same files is guilty of infringement because it's not fair use, and a company will never know without a court trial what the verdict will be.
Conversely, google's use might not be fair use but somebody else's might.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote