View Single Post
Old 06-21-2015, 04:14 AM   #8
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
So everybody that have a copy of än ebook are copyright infringers. That is good. Then we will get less arguments against copyright infringements here.
No, this is about format-shifting, not copying of digital media. It would only impact someone who created their own ebooks by scanning paper books; I suspect that not many people do that. It will remain legal to make as many copies as you want of ebooks that you've bought, and it will remain illegal to copy an ebook that you haven't bought (unless it's in the public domain, etc etc).

Basically it may be a reversion to the silly situation we had for many years whereby someone was technically breaking the law if they bought a music CD and ripped it to their MP3 player, a position that everyone, government and music industry included, agreed was ridiculous, and for which nobody was ever prosecuted.

It'll be interesting to see what the court decides is the appropriate course of action next month.

Last edited by HarryT; 06-21-2015 at 04:29 AM.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote