View Single Post
Old 12-22-2008, 08:00 AM   #11
sabredog
Geographically Restricted
sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sabredog ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
sabredog's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,630
Karma: 14933353
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Sony PRS-T3, Kindle Voyage, iPad Air2, Nexus7v2
Quote:
Originally Posted by sianon View Post
It is indeed iinet, I was stuck for remembering the name of the provider this morning. Hopefully the current legal action will not be successful. The fact that iinet are being targeted makes me wonder if the big two, Telstra and Optus are complying with these unreasonable demands.

Karen
Apparently not. They are fully supportive of iinet as the ramifications to ISP's here would be severe indeed.

AFACT have chosen the third largest ISP to sue thinking their weak evidence is going to survive in a court. They may believe iiNet might capitulate but Michael Malone (CEO) is going to defend vigorously.

The initial court hearing has resulted in the judge instructing AFACT to provide more evidence and data to iiNet.

This broo haha is the tip of the iceberg though. The federal government still want to pursue their pie in the sky national internet filter. The upsurge against this is growing however.

Cheers

SD
sabredog is offline   Reply With Quote