View Single Post
Old 06-11-2015, 08:19 PM   #78
gweeks
Fanatic
gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 509
Karma: 3455210
Join Date: Apr 2007
Device: Rocket, Nook ST, Kobo WiFi, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
Why do I get the impression that there are several people who have horribly misunderstood what I said?

A rights-holder can pull their product from the market. ingmar's proposed legislation takes away that right by legalizing unauthorized copies if the rights-holder exercises that right.
And you've totally missed the point of statutory licenses. If you have EVER published a song, anyone that wants to can do a cover of it and you have no control over it whatsoever. They simply have to pay you the statutory license rate and they can do anything they want to with it. Nothing you can do can remove it. There are other statutory licenses in the world besides music. Music however is a copyright one.

Greg
gweeks is offline   Reply With Quote