Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg
A non-nefarious reason is that they think forgoing corporate welfare will improve their reputation for good citizenship. And that may be a big part of it.
However, if they only plan "to be in the area for a couple years," expecting layoffs from the get-go, that's nefarious.
Here's a third possibility: They expect to stay around many years but quickly replace people with robots. (Further automation, ideally introduced in a gradual way avoiding layoffs, is inevitable.)
|
Yes of course.
Participating in an economy while preparing for a window of profitability that will not be continuous is "nefarious".
Math is racist, profit is sexist, evil economic analysis, Yada Yada yada.