Quote:
Originally Posted by V3t
I plan to have a much closer look tomorrow with them both running in daylight, will make for a better comparison when I take pictures. It should also rule out the frontlight from the equation. It does seem eink manufacture displays with or without lights, but in general I'd imagine companies do it themselves hence the differences you can see in youtube videos for example.
|
From the looks, the Energy Sistem eReaderPro(+) is a relabeled Boyue T62D(+) ; this is not a complaint, as the Boyue is currently hard to come by (Banggood stock has been sold out for a while), and the eReaderPro+ is very competitively priced (for us Europeans).
The variation in frontlight colour would imply the speculated OEM (Boyue/Boeye) implementing different parts in a very short time (which, on second thought, shouldn't be to much of a surprise).
Nevertheless, I went the advised road, disabling the frontlight and taking daytime pictures :
(T62D+ vs Pro+)
(T62D+ detail)
(Pro+ detail)
(T61 / T62D+ / Pro+)
While it may not be immediately visible from the rather low-quality pictures (slightly fuzzy pictures, inexpensive camera), in reality the T62D+ has definitely a very nice slightly cream-like screen, with no visible texturing. From the closeup, I think it is reasonable to say the T62D+ has the better contrast too.
The eReaderPro+ screen is much more white, has less contrast, and suffers from dithering/pixelation (especially with darker grey backgrounds), appearing more like the T61 (which in my particular case is not too representative for a good Pearl screen).
These pictures were taken with a disabled frontlight ; with an active frontlight, the differences become even more visible.
Meanwhile, an ES representative has courteously
replied in a response to my ES forum post, assuring the Pro+ is equipped with certified Carta screens.