View Single Post
Old 05-24-2015, 10:44 AM   #48
Katsunami
Grand Sorcerer
Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Katsunami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,111
Karma: 34000001
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: KPW1, KA1
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I honestly don't think that RAID is any "safer" than a normal disk. A few years ago I had a RAID 5 Buffalo NAS. The RAID controller failed and fried 3 of the four disks in the RAID array, meaning that had I not had (which obviously I did have!) a backup, I would have lost my data.
You think correctly; it isn't. RAID (any form of it, such as 1 and 5) is not a backup. It is just a safeguard, providing you a chance, but not a guarantee, that you don't need to pull out your backup. Obviously, replacing a drive and rebuilding the array is much faster than copying back a huge multi-terabyte backup.

A RAID0 array, striping data over multiple disks, so read/write can use more than one disk at once, is actually built for speed, not for safety. If one disk in a RAID0 array fails, everything is gone.
Katsunami is offline   Reply With Quote