View Single Post
Old 05-22-2015, 11:35 AM   #75
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
You know that's why I tend to ignore the normal "prove it" posts demanding that I show evidence that disagrees with someone's closely held faith. Usually such posters don't want evidence one way or the other, they are just looking for a starting point to start blasting. You asked for evidence that the publisher rather than Apple suggested agency pricing. I gave it to you.

I'm aware of Judge Cote's judgement and have read it. Just because she claims something doesn't make it fact. That's one of the points of the appeal.
I'm not too fussed over who first proposed Agency during the publisher-Apple chats. But i notice you seem to be finally accepting that Apple did engage in coordinating talks to have the publishers demand, en masse, an Agency model which included prices arbitrarily fixed at certain Apple-approved price points.

I am proud of you.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote