View Single Post
Old 05-22-2015, 06:37 AM   #74
darryl
Wizard
darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
darryl's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
You know that's why I tend to ignore the normal "prove it" posts demanding that I show evidence that disagrees with someone's closely held faith. Usually such posters don't want evidence one way or the other, they are just looking for a starting point to start blasting. You asked for evidence that the publisher rather than Apple suggested agency pricing. I gave it to you.

I'm aware of Judge Cote's judgement and have read it. Just because she claims something doesn't make it fact. That's one of the points of the appeal.
Seriously? Your "proof" is an Arts Technica post which actually wasn't too bad but was perhaps a little carelessly worded. My response was taken directly from the judgment which was based on the actual evidence heard. I have not so far been able to find a copy of the actual grounds of Appeal but I would be amazed if Apple is even contesting this question of fact.
darryl is offline   Reply With Quote