View Single Post
Old 05-19-2015, 03:05 PM   #50
BearMountainBooks
Maria Schneider
BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BearMountainBooks's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post


Now I have a question for you. At what point in your misreading of my post did you decide that I don't want people to have the right to privacy?
I did not misread your post, but your conclusion about my statement is incorrect. My statement stands alone, with or without your argument, having noting to do with you, and is my statement, not yours: People should have a right to privacy and not have to explain why they wish to be anonymous (so long as they are not up to anything illegal, nefarious or hurtful to someone and in the case of book discussions we don't need to go and elaborate every possible contortion). It may not make sense how a person decides to attempt privacy, but if they don't wish to vote in a public poll and then DO post their opinions publicly, that's okay. We all want choices and we want to exercise those choices.
BearMountainBooks is offline