Thread: CC Beta 3.6.7* is now production as V3.6.8
View Single Post
Old 05-16-2015, 11:57 AM   #7
Purple Lady
Grand Sorcerer
Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Purple Lady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Purple Lady's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,698
Karma: 16542228
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Device: Huawei MediaPad M5, LG V30, Boyue T80S, Nexus 7 LTE, K3 3G, Fire HD8
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaley View Post
The way auto-delete is currently implemented the value in CC is the minimum number of days that must pass before a book will be deleted. I did this because I thought it was safer, but thinking about it more I realize that my scheme is potentially dangerous.

The problem: the user must set this number to the lowest value desired and existing in the cc_delete_after_ tag. This means that news without a tag will be deleted using that low value. It would probably be safer if this number be the default and permit the cc_delete_after_ tag to specify a lower number. That way the user can specify a higher number which will apply to new feeds and feeds without the tag.

Comments?
Does that number have to lower? What happens if I set that number to be 10 and the tag is set to 5?
Purple Lady is offline   Reply With Quote