View Single Post
Old 05-16-2015, 06:00 AM   #6
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,486
Karma: 8025704
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
The way auto-delete is currently implemented the value in CC is the minimum number of days that must pass before a book will be deleted. I did this because I thought it was safer, but thinking about it more I realize that my scheme is potentially dangerous.

The problem: the user must set this number to the lowest value desired and existing in the cc_delete_after_ tag. This means that news without a tag will be deleted using that low value. It would probably be safer if this number be the default and permit the cc_delete_after_ tag to specify a lower number. That way the user can specify a higher number which will apply to new feeds and feeds without the tag.

Comments?
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote