View Single Post
Old 05-15-2015, 09:54 AM   #6
Abekonge
Scripler Project Lead
Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.Abekonge has met Morla.
 
Abekonge's Avatar
 
Posts: 19
Karma: 19304
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
Device: Gameboy Color
Thanks for the feedback odedta and dickloraine!

There is no margin-top/bottom on the paragraphs - in the video there is just blank lines between the parapgraphs for some reason. (If you want you can actually add e.g. margin-top or first line indents to paragraphs of a new template - you can make you own templates, with full control of most relevant css via a control panel (margins, firstline-indent, fonts, font-size, line-height, semantics, text-alignments, bold, italic, caps, super/sub, lists). (NB!The full styling panel and the make-your-own-design-templates-functionality are still early versions, so there are known glitches there...)

I agree that first line indent would be great as a default in at least some templates, and this is what we initially had. But for it to really work we needed to give the user control of this - so we prioritized to not include first-line indents until we could give the user full control over the indentation rules for the templates.

As for the fonts, I am of the opinion that creators should be able to define the default look for their works, as they do in print books and as they do on websites - since the typographical experience is central to a good reading experience (IMHO). But only for the default look, so that you as a user can always change the font on your reader system of choice. (how this is defined in our CSS needs to play nice with how readers systems changes the fonts - this is something that might need more work to work with all reader systems, though).

All in all there is a lot of prioritizing with a project like this - what we use a lot of energy on right now is securing that people can't make invalid epubs. Since we try to give people a lot of (non-coding) control - there are a lot of variables to consider. But it's getting better and better.

The coming version 0.0.6 has experimental publish-to-the-web functionality, ads color-controls, better word-import and in general a lot of polishing.
Abekonge is offline   Reply With Quote