View Single Post
Old 05-11-2015, 05:19 AM   #231
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,819
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
I'm not sure I really see much point in worrying too much about how many of the nominated books a voter has read. Absolutely none of us will have read all books written in any given decade - so the vote is already skewed. The nominations have come from just that (probably quite small) subset of books from each decade that each nominator happens to have read. We are then asking people to vote on this already skewed, very tiny, subset of books from a decade. How much can it matter if they've only read a couple of them?
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote