View Single Post
Old 05-10-2015, 05:55 AM   #31
Notjohn
mostly an observer
Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,519
Karma: 987654
Join Date: Dec 2012
Device: Kindle
I have been following this with (somewhat bemused) interest. At first I didn't see the point of what you're trying to do--that you were searching for the solution to a problem that doesn't exist. So I looked at the Chicago Manual of Style for enlightenment and found that, as expected, it didn't address the situation at all. But when I look closer, I see that there is indeed a sliver of space between doubled quotation marks, and these are not duplicated in my (ancient, to be sure) version of Word. I'm at 10.25-26 in the 14th edition.

The CSM gives this example, of a quote within a quote within a quote: “I eat what I see.”’” But on the printed page, there is a discernible (though just discernible) space between the single quote and the enclosing double quotes.

Later: Interestingly, after hitting Post, I can see the barest sliver between those sets of quotes. It's more than I see in Word (or pasted into this window) but still less than what I see in the CSM.

Last edited by Notjohn; 05-10-2015 at 05:59 AM.
Notjohn is offline   Reply With Quote